Talk:Rachel Pain

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Moved back live

@Superboilles: I've moved this back live, as the person is indeed notable per WP:NPROF. This can absolutely use more sourcing and sprucing up, but when notability is established it's best to leave the page up unless it's absolutely unsalvageable. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack: Okie dokie. But then isn't there an issue with the CoI? Superboilles (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, COI editing doesn't mean that an article shouldn't be kept or that the article is problematic per se. The article would need to be reviewed for non-neutral language and notability, but it's entirely possible for someone to edit with a conflict of interest. There's just a very specific way that they would need to go about it, such as creating new articles in WP:AFC and refraining from making large, especially controversial edits to the article - not to mention ensuring that they follow notability, sourcing, and neutrality guidelines to a T while also being transparent.

I'll post on your talk page for the other part of this since it doesn't entirely pertain to the article. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]