Talk:Rachel Elnaugh

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

RachelElnaughLoveDragon (talk · contribs) / Rachel Elnaugh-LOVE (talk · contribs) / 95.149.123.7 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight.

Rotheram connection

I have removed this edit because it is unreferenced and even if it was referenced it is irrelevant in an encyclopedia article.Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081203133919/http://www.managementconsultancy.co.uk/accountancyage/news/2140734/elnaugh-ousted-red-letter-dys to http://www.managementconsultancy.co.uk/accountancyage/news/2140734/elnaugh-ousted-red-letter-dys

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517135957/http://www.bizview.tv/examples/bv088-rachel-elnaugh.php to http://www.bizview.tv/examples/bv088-rachel-elnaugh.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peak District farm

I just removed the following text from the article:

Elnaugh has recently made the headlines for acquiring land in the Peak District National Park to start a self-sustaining community in preparation for the oncoming “food apocalypse”. The local Planning Authority has issues a series of stop notices and tree preservation orders to protect the local environment from the potential damage that Elnaugh's group will cause.

Elnaugh denies that she is starting a self-sustaining community, though she does acknowledge she is creating a community farm, per the Derby Telegraph article.[1] The controversy appears to be generated as much by statements vaguely attributed to local residents. Thus, I'm concerned that the text above, under a heading of "Controversy", is a breach of NPOV. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cressbrook Dale Update Needed

Info re:Cressbrook dale needs updating as it appears local authority has deemed work on land in breach of planning and have taken enforcement action. Currently states "controversial with residents", but appears works to have taken place without appropriate legal approval and then rectified. Not sure if this is worth correcting?

Source:[2]

Thanks

Ruddiga93 (talk) 09:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]