This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)ProfMadProfmad (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
RTI-31:- The material acquired was from a reliable source. The supply quickly went quiet?
250mg was tested over a 24 hour period. It had little, to no anaesthetic quality. Effects noticeable at 5mg doses, and extrememy euphoric by sublingual ad. A longer t1/2 than Cocaine, and preferable!
I doubt it will reliably reappear, since, it is a highly habituating substance.
Some forums suggest the materials tested was not RTI-1, with 'peculiar' recounts, since its effects are potently obvious. 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)ProfMadProfmad (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is very technically written (and at some points clunky in grammar) and needs language softening for general readability. An expert in pharmaceutical chemistry will need to do this. I cannot. Grammarpolicealpha (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]