User talk:Profmad

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Human chorionic gonadotropin‎ are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Lyrl^Talk _C 22:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not use talk pages such as Modafinil for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 14:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Within Wikipedia, we require references from reliable sources even from subject experts. Wikipedia:Verifiability explains this in more detail. Also please note that Talk pages are for discussion, not posting new articles. Lyrl^Talk _C 01:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

APOLOGIES 20:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)ProfMad20:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)~ Please accept my apologies, you are quite correct in your assertion. At the time of writing, this drug was principle in my recovery from olanzapine-induced diabetes. Thus: a) my clarity was poor, & b) the vigour of health returning, resulted in my euligising the compound. This drug turned my life around, and though a CNS stimulant, is undoubtedly both different & unique from previous stimulants, however much these may also differ pharmacologically. A medicine with great potential. 20:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)ProfMad20:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GODS TOYS

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GODS TOYS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Codeine, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Profmad

A tag has been placed on User:Profmad, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]