Talk:Questions: Philosophy for Young People

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sponsors?

In a recent edit Guillaume2303 removed York College as current sponsor and Michigan State as past sponsor, while leaving Northwest Center and American Philosophical Association. Should all be excluded? YCP included, and Michigan State included in the History subsection? Quine (talk) 19:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous edit added all kinds of promotional language and inappropriate content, so I reverted it. If somewhere in there some valid info was contained, that was also thrown out inadvertently. I let your recent addition stand, but you need to clarify it, "recognized" is very ambiguous. Was this an award? Did they simply mention the journal somewhere? --Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I clarified the recognition language to give additional context. (BTW: the recent major edit was not by me, but by 192.245.87.10, I just watch the entry.) Quine (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for adding that reference, which shows that this was absolutely trivial and not "recognition". It was just a mention in one of the myriad reports that UNESCO churns out every year. I have removed the whole section on this "recognition". --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]