Talk:Quercus texana
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Common names
[edit]I propose changing the common name for this species to Nuttall's oak and Texas red oak. These are the accepted common names on well respected sites such as Flora of North America Flora, USDA Plant Profiles, and Trees of North America. According to those sources, the common name Buckley's oak (currently used in this article) applies to Quercus buckleyi (See: Flora of North America, USDA Plant Profiles, and Trees of North America. Personally, I do not like the common name Texas red oak for current-day Q. texana, since this species occurs mostly to the east of Texas and that common name was only adopted because of the Q. texana/Q. buckleyi misidentification. But I also concede that it is important to have the Wikipedia article agree with the current-day literature. And yes, the Q. buckleyi page should also be revised based on this discussion. Comments please. Pinethicket (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree wholeheartedly that this common name is simply wrong. The only people who've ever used the common name of Buckley's Oak for this species are uninformed taxonomists. Buckley's Oak of course is a common name for what used to be Quercus texana, which is now Q. buckleyi. I have yet to meet anyone who lives within the native range of this species which calls it anything other than Nuttall's Oak. A few botanists, including the authors of Flora of North America, insist on using Texas Red Oak as a common name, but like I said, I've asked people in Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, and even East Texas what they call this oak, and everyone says Nuttall's Oak. That's not scientific, but it does say something about what the common name for this oak is. Outside of its native range this oak is almost exclusively called Nuttall's Oak and the same is true in the horticultural world. The scientific name change is the problem which lead to scientists to also change the common name associated with this oak and that's not logical, scientific, nor accurate in my opinion. I haven't looked very hard, but so far I haven't found one scientific work which calls this species anything other than Nuttall's Oak before the scientific name change occurred. So, I too propose changing the common name on this page to Nuttall's Oak and maybe putting Texas Red Oak as a secondary name. Kmanblue (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Quercus texana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090815090721/http://www.mdc.mo.gov:80/areas/natareas/scientif.htm to http://mdc.mo.gov/areas/natareas/scientif.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Occurrence along east coast
[edit]Does Quercus texana Buckley really occur in North Carolina as commonly as was indicated in the added reference, or is this a misidentification and/or referring to some other species, like Quercus palustris? see page in the reference: G. Pinchot & W. W. Ashe's 1891 "Timber trees and forests of North Carolina". For Q. texana, there is a single county near the east coast on BONAP, nothing on USDA PLANTS, and nothing in FNA. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 22:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- My understanding is that the name Q. texana has long been confused/misapplied. I wouldn't trust any source that isn't very recent. Plantdrew (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)