Talk:Quemuenchatocha

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Colombia Mid‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Low‑importance

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Change the name of the article

Modern investigation and a proper reading of bureaucratic, early Spanish documents, showed that the name of this cacique was Eucaneme, and not Quemuenchatocha, which is a name created by later chroniclers decades after the events. Colombian scholar Jorge Gamboa has written a lot about it.

https://imagenesyespejismos.wordpress.com/2018/08/13/la-pintura-mural-en-tunja-descubiertos-nuevos-tesoros-escondidos-de-la-ciudad-colonial-s-xvi-xvii/

https://www.icanh.gov.co/sala_prensa/actualidad_icanh/historico_noticias/novedades_editoriales_icanh_feria_7835/7812

http://www.uptc.edu.co/export/sites/default/facultades/f_educacion/maestria/patrim_cultural/inf_adicional/documentos/dialogos_patri_cultural.pdf

See WP:COMMONNAME. Can you demonstrate that this cacique is, today, better known as Eucaneme? Either way, except for where alternative names are explicitly discussed as such, an article's subject should consistently be named consistently, from the title through the article. Confusing the reader is not our goal. Largoplazo (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming this is meant for User:A r m i n i u s. Largoplazo (talk) 00:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.elespectador.com/colombia/mas-regiones/existio-o-no-el-cacique-tisquesusa-article-490297/

Using a translator here you can read: "What happened with Tisquesusa is the same as what happened with the cacique Quemuenchatocha. “These are names that we don't know where they really came from, because they do not appear in the original documents. In the case of the cacique of Hunza, in the chronicles he appears as Quemuenchatocha, but in the original documents the name Eucaneme appears instead. And the origin of the name Quemuenchatocha is not from the cacique but from a nephew of his who was called Quiminza”, says Gamboa.

I have read a transcription of the contemporary archive documents mentioning the name "Eucaneme" for this cacique, it's located in Seville's General Archive of Indies. It's "AGI, J 488, pieza 6, ff. 4 r.-5 v." Testimony of Ramiriquí, psihipqua of Tunja entrusted to a Diego de Robles

https://appsciso.uniandes.edu.co/sip/data/pdf/los_muiscas_siglo_XVI_XVII.pdf page 149 "the true one, named Eucaneme (...)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by A r m i n i u s (talk • contribs) 18:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]