Talk:Queen Elizabeth Hall

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An insult to the Queen

It is embarrassing that this monstrosity is named after the Queen. If it were named after me I would feel angry and insulted. It should be renamed to something suitably dull - though only as a temporary measure pre-demolition. Luwilt (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not named after the Queen, the current Queen is Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Elizabeth was the Queen Mother, who is sadly now deceased and can do little about this turd being named in her honour. I think everyone and their dog just wishes they had spent the original 1950's money on rebuilding Queen's Hall on Regents Street rather than on the RFH, a daft festival of Britain and yet more ugly Southbank buildings in the 60's and 70's.

In terms of the undercroft the Government did not save it, if you read the Time Out Article, the Government merely said the Southbank Centre is an independent arts centre (thus nothing to do with them) and makes it's own decisions on such matters, however the Government supports activities for young people. The Undercroft may still be redveoped, indeed this building may yet be demolished as it has been turned down for listing on a number of occasions by succesive Governments, and can not re-apply for listed status in the foreseable future.

Personally I would welcome a new concert hall for London, perhaps the rebuilding of the Old Queens Hall or new hall in a beautiful location such as near to Regents Park. If a decent Hall was built in London with decent acoustic, there would be no need for music lovers to visit either the Barbican Centre (a fan shaped hall, with no organ) or the Southbank Centre which has both the Royal Festival Hall and Queen Elizabeth Hall, neither of which is up to scratch.

The ideal solution would be to build a proper new Concert Hall with proper acoustics away from these ugly arts centres and then cut off their public money. Let the skateboarders and tramps have the brutalist Southbank and move the music to a new location, one which we can be proud of. If the World Monument Fund want to pay for the Southbanks upkeep let them, I am not bothered as long as the public money stops.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Elizabeth Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111005015050/http://www.dobedo.co.uk/dbd_viewmedia.php?mId=8&osCsid=e8uhl8umcg97hehni60uftvvj6 to http://www.dobedo.co.uk/dbd_viewmedia.php?mId=8&osCsid=e8uhl8umcg97hehni60uftvvj6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Elizabeth Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619133218/http://www.vauxhallcivicsociety.org.uk/vauxhall-history-c.html to http://www.vauxhallcivicsociety.org.uk/vauxhall-history-c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]