This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Queen Anne Revival architecture (Britain) would be best. The move should have been discussed "Chiswick Chap moved page British Queen Anne Revival to British Queen Anne Revival architecture: match other architecture articles" is ridiculous, but unfortunately he has a penchant for these. Johnbod (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If we need to change it to that, no objection; the name must not imply that there is one unified architectural style in Britain and elsewhere, as the styles are quite different. On the comment about me, that's a clear breach of WP:NPA; I made the move to fit in as closely as possible with the naming of similar articles. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]