Talk:Quadruple jump controversy

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Figure Skating

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Ladies' singles#Responses|Sochi Ladies' singles judging controversy]] The anchor (#Responses) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This seems to be a very long and pointless article

Seriously? At the very least it should be edited down and rewritten. 66.26.95.207 (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I erased a comment under the "Monetary" section that stated that the Russian's short program was "techinically brilliant". That is an opinion and is not a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.117.174 (talk) 17:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone re-added it, so i'm deleting it again. 71.140.0.46 (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelievably long article all so Plushenko can whine about how he deserved the gold and it's all. So. Unfaaaaaair. 64.132.218.4 (talk) 21:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is rambling and redundant. It's a terrible Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.233.69 (talk) 04:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely get rid. This article is ridiculously biased--did Plushy write it? He well-deserved to lose, his flailing LP was pretty bad. 208.185.94.10 (talk) 22:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an opinion article, one that is one-sided toward Plushenko only, and does not reflect at all the view of the majority of the skating community outside of Russia. I am appalled that this is allowed on Wikipedia. At the very least, it needs a complete overhaul including but not limited to: Including the other side with a full discussion, as well as using actual rules under the international judging system. I am not going to be the one to waste my time doing so as this really is just a pointless attack post masquarading as a legitimate Wikipedia article. It isn't disputed that Plushenko himself admitted to having no transitions. No one put those words in his mouth. So he was actually according to the rules overscored, because 0 transitions should result in a 0 for that mark. This article should be discussing whether the quad is undervalued by the rules. That is a very legitimate debate, and one that I actually support. That has also since been resolved to most's satisfaction after this 2010 Olympics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:9645:9300:2B:BBC0:9742:7BE4 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lobbying is nothing new in figure skating. American Olympic-level figure skating judge sent e-mails to more than 60 colleague judges and officials just before Olympic games mentioning Plushenko and Joubert in particular. Totally unethical. We've seen what happened in Salt Lake city 2002 and Sochi 2014. And Vancouver? Over one-half of figure skating fans of the world disagreed with the decision. Quadruple jump controversy is one of the many figure skating scandals and it has something more than a conspiracy theory. This article is very convincing and worth reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.62.215.182 (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quadruple jump controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091025194336/http://www.vancouver2010.com/ to http://www.vancouver2010.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]