Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting" Section
[edit]The entirety of the aforementioned section is made of quotations from one webpage. Obviously quoting is fine, but when there is nothing in the section except quotations and all those quotations are from the same source, it might be/border on plagiarism, so I think someone needs to take a look at this. --EcheveriaJ (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- EcheveriaJ, if you are referring to Note 3-7: Those are referring to different websites. It is the same root domain (pulitzer.org) but different websites, a plagiarism detector further did not find any exciting. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class awards articles
- Low-importance awards articles
- Awards articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- List-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles