Talk:Public services in Brighton and Hove
 | A fact from Public services in Brighton and Hove appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that local regulation and law enforcement in Brighton's early history was carried out by the Society of Twelve, a Beadle "in cocked hat and full regalia", and two "Old Charlies"? Source: Antony Dale (1950), The History and Architecture of Brighton, page 59 (offline source). Quote: "In the early years of Brighton's history the only authority which existed for the regulation of local affairs consisted of a body known as the Society or Fellowship of Twelve ... [i]n the daytime a Town Crier or Beadle in cocked hat and full regalia operated as a constable ... at night the patrol of two watchmen, or Old Charlies as they were called, perambulated the town ..."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Basilica of Saint Mary of the Assumption (Lancaster, Ohio)
- Comment: Worthy but awfully boring topic, so let's have a colourful hook. Fully sourced to Dale (1950) as above. This article was developed on and off in a sandbox and has been copied across to mainspace today in one go. Material for the hook is in the second paragraph of the "Police" paragraph. No image is suitable. QPQ review is still "open" pending resolution of issues and I have pinged the nominator.
Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC).
Hi Hassocks5489, what an excellent article. It's the first of its kind that I've seen (though I see you have made others for Crawley and Worthing) and a great way to summarise diverse aspects of local hsitory. Review follows: article created 2 September and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I only checked a small sample of the almost 200 citations but found no overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article, happy to AGF that it checks out to offline source cited, the quote provided above certainly does; a QPQ review has been commenced; looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
