Talk:Public opinion on gun control in the United States

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public opinion on gun control in the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 years

Politics: American / Gun politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.
	This article is supported by Gun politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Misleading title?

I was hoping this article would give insight into the varying opinions about gun control and gun ownership over time. Data on people's opinions and on people's gun owning habits has been gathered for many decades but this article touches on barely any of it.

Things that might beneficial to cover:

public opinions on particular subjects over time (ie, handgun bans, semiauto bans, bans on publicly carrying (concealed/open), etc
public opinions vs voting patterns- for example, in the 70s there was seemingly strong public support for banning handguns in MA, but when it came time to vote, voters were strongly against it. Similar patterns were observed in the 90s and 2000s regarding assault weapons bans
gun ownership patterns over the decades
a timeline of gun regulation efforts (successful or not), gun control attitudes, gun ownership patterns, etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.57.214.46 (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.kusi.com/san-diego-city-council-approves-new-gun-safety-law/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/ https://hub.jhu.edu/2022/05/02/highest-number-of-gun-related-deaths-in-2020-report/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 02:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Soibangla: Was there any reason for your revert besides an objection to the use of the word "generally" rather than "overwhelmingly"? I reworded the sentence and removed the bulleted list because it's an almost word-for-word copy of this source, specifically the passage that begins with Zoom in. I suppose it's not as critical to replace "overwhelmingly" with "generally", although I think their meanings are similar enough that it isn't really a big deal and I reworded the sentence out of an abundance of caution to avoid close paraphrasing issues. — SamX [talk · contribs] 17:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SamX "Generally" is a preposterous misrepresentation of the source. I believe the paraphrasing of bullets is sufficiently distant from a copyvio. I recommend you restore with perhaps a tweak or two if you disagree. But "generally" needs to go. soibangla (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that using the word "generally" is preposterous, but I'd be fine with something along the lines of registered voters were supportive of stricter gun control laws by a wide margin. As for the bullets, I don't think it's necessary to include the support percentages in response to every single survey question, but I think we could instead list some of the proposed measures, like so: Measures supported by the majority of respondents included criminal background checks, mental health evaluations of prospective gun owners, a 30-day for every purchase, and a law against civilian ownership of semiautomatic weapons. I don't think the bulleted list should be restored—it was very similar to the list in the Axios article (copyvios report), and I doubt that a tweak or two would be enough to resolve close paraphrasing issues. — SamX [talk · contribs] 17:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well, we just really disagree about "generally." I'd prefer registered voters overwhelmingly supported a variety of gun control measures. "Overwhelmingly" is a key takeaway from the findings and source. Replace the bullets with narrative including numbers if you must, but I maintain they would require only a little tweaking, if any. soibangla (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done [1]. I've added quotation marks to "overwhelmingly" as well. They aren't intended to be scare quotes, but rather attribution to the wording used in the source per MOS:QUOTE. — SamX [talk · contribs] 18:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]