Talk:Public Relations Society of America

Public Relations Society of America has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 1, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public Relations Society of America article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 210 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Jack O'Dwyer (November 1, 2012). "WP Tackles PRS vs. O'Dwyer Battle". O'Dwyer's.
Jack O'Dwyer (November 5, 2012). "Wikipedia Retreats from History of PR Society". O'Dwyer's.
Jack O'Dwyer (November 12, 2012). "Error-Ridden WP Entry on PRSA Needs Repair". O'Dwyer's.

Strategies & Tactics Update Request...

Hi, I'm following up on my request of March 30, 2020, to make a change to the second paragraph of the "Services" section, in which I requested a change to the second paragraph to this: "PRSA's Public Relations Journal was published from October 1945 to 1995. Its original mission statement was "to carry articles that deal with fundamental public relations problems, as they currently press for solution." In January 2018, PRSA combined Tactics, its monthly newspaper, with The Strategist, its quarterly magazine, to create Strategies & Tactics, an all-new monthly publication."

On January 26, 2020, you did respond to my initial request of Jan. 23, by adding an external link instead of changing the body of the text as I did not provide a source outside PRSA. I am now including below an outside source, so would like to request again that the copy above actually be added to the text if possible, in order to provide clarification to readers. As always, I very much appreciate your help with this.

Thank you.

Rod Granger Rhdg1 (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outside Source: https://muckrack.com/media-outlet/StrategiesTactics

Thank you. Rhdg1 (talk) 19:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information for Strategies & Tactics Update Request...

Hi, regarding my above request to revise information on PRSA's Strategies & Tactics publication, I'm including below a link to an additional outside source. As always, I appreciate your help with this.

Rod Granger Rhdg1 (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outside Source: https://beehivepr.biz/ayme-zemke-discusses-authentic-apologies-in-a-crisis-with-prsa-strategies-tactics/ Rhdg1 (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on Strategies & Tactics Update Request...

Hi, I wanted to check in regarding my request to revise the second paragraph of the "Services" Section. As always, thank you for your help.

Rod Granger Rhdg1 (talk) Rhdg1 (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on Strategies & Tactics Update Request...

Hi, as in previous requests, I'd like to update the second paragraph of the "Services" Section, as it currently contains outdated information (a footnote was added a few years ago but it would be great to reflect this in the paragraph itself (This request is not about promotion, it's about updating inaccurate and dated information). Please let me know the best way to proceed with this. As always, I want to follow the proper protocol, and I thank you for your help.

Rod Rhdg1 (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm feeling very stymied by the lack of response to my repeated inquries about some proposed (sourced) changes to the PRSA page. I've always followed protocol, and have received help for a number of requests, so I'm not quite sure why I'm not hearing anything at all about my several previous messages on this topic. Can someone let me know that these messages are being received, and what I might do differently to received a response? Thank you for your help with this.

Rod

Rhdg1 (talk) Rhdg1 (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some material, somewhat reworded, that can be supported by the primary source. Muckrack is generally bot-scraped material or supplied by publishers/PR. The Beehive link looks like a company blog post. In the future, you can probably get attention at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business, or maybe WP:Helpdesk. I'm probably not the best person to help unless the addition is pretty simple; I'm really picky about sourcing and not super-fond of COI/paid editing in general. You've been pretty patient and careful, but that's be about six standard deviations away from the usual marketing/communications people we run in to here. :) Sam Kuru (talk) 03:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you very much for the edit and the advice.

Rod

Rhdg1 (talk) Rhdg1 (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Section for Code of Ethics?

The Code of Ethics is buried in the services section. I think it should be more visible, however (particularly since I wouldn’t think of it as a service). Could a section be created for it (or a joint section for Accreditation and Ethical Code)? Is there a convention for this? Another alternative would be to move it to the history or organization sections. Tiggeritian (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead with separating out the Code of Ethics as there weren't objections. Tiggeritian (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]