Talk:Public Eye on Davos

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Tax "evasion"

Citigroup received its award for the unscrupulous advice it gave to tax evaders.

and later

KPMG received its award for encouraging its clients to practice aggressive tax evasion.

These should probably say "tax avoidance". Advising tax evasion would be illegal and I doubt these companies would, or did, do that. Hairy Dude (talk) 00:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after reading KPMG it seems they did indeed admit to facilitating tax evasion in 2005, so at least that part isn't libellous. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Does this article present its topic from a neutral point of view? In particular, is the tone too sympathetic to the political and moral perspectives of the event organisers and supporters? Matt (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CorporateAccountability: Updated according to German Public Eye page 10:35 +19,993

Hi @CorporateAccountability:, imho there is absolutely no need to completely replace the cooperative work of years on 29 Jan 2015 10:35-10:42 ... by claiming updated according to German Public Eye page. imho maybe even worsing Public Eye Awards by, in addition, kicking away imho more reliable and imho much more existing adequate references etc. And imho there was no request to expand by DE-WP content, therefore, plus restore. Regards, Roland zh (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Version 03:28, 25 January 2015 re-established in good faith. see also versions and chaotic bot fixes starting the past two days. related edits seem to be 1:1 copy of German language Wikipedia. so no consence pls restore, 213.55.184.148 (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]