Talk:Ptychography
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ptychography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Pronunciation Guide
[edit]Would someone who knows how to say it correctly please add a key to the correct pronunciation of ptychography. It's all Greek to me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by His Manliness (talk • contribs) 23:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
pronounced "tychography", silent P
http://users.ph.tum.de/gu74hih/research.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.161.54.207 (talk) 06:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- etymological pronunciation (non-Anglicized): p tiKOgraphy
- Greek pronunciation: p tiHOgraphy (h as in horror)
Please add additional Literature proofing the concept ot Ptychography with X-ray on the Nanometer scale...(first proof on that level!!!)
[edit]M. Dierolf, A. Menzel, P. Thibault, P. Schneider, C. M. Kewish, R. Wepf, O. Bunk, F. Pfeiffer. Ptychographic X-Ray Computed Tomography at the Nano-Scale, Nature 467, 436–440, 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.116.101 (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Mention of relevant patents
[edit]I think this article should include some mention of the patents owned by Phase Focus Ltd. I spent a lot of time this summer writing a sort of intro-to-ptychography software package, only to find out today that I can't actually make it publicly available to the open-source community. Since the academic literature is focused primarily on the methods rather than the politics, I got the impression that the issues were covered under copyright law rather than patent law, and that I would therefore be able to emulate the "essence" of iterative ptychography as long as I didn't copy the "substance."
In the interest of preventing others from making this mistake, I think this would be an important thing to include on the Wiki page. However, due to my recent negative experience, I don't trust myself to write such an addition without casting the patent holders in an unfairly negative light. Is there anyone on this page that would be willing to address this?