Talk:Psychological journeys of Middle-earth

Psychological journeys of Middle-earth has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 28, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Psychological journeys of Middle-earth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 16:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Some duplinks according to the tool.

The only ones I see are in image captions, which is considered acceptable (once in text, once in caption).

"Scholars including psychoanalysts have" Commas

Added.

"stories of" Maybe "about" instead?

Done.

"Guide figures" Why the capital G?

Removed.

"On Klein's theory" and "On Vygotsky's theory" isn't "in xyz's theory" a more common construction?

Done.

"Gollum as Devouring Mother" This was mentioned in the table earlier, but you could add a gloss explaining it here as well.

Glossed.

The images are all licensed and used correctly.

Noted.

The references are all reliable and formatted correctly.
Spotchecks:
- Flieger, Verlyn (1996). "Tolkien's Experiment with Time: The Lost Road, The Notion Club Papersand J.W. Dunne". Mythlore. Verifies all claims made.
- Matthews, Dorothy (1975). "The Psychological Journey of Bilbo Baggins". In Lobdell, Jared (ed.). A Tolkien Compass. Verifies all claims made.
- Harl, Allison (2007). "The monstrosity of the gaze: critical problems with a film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings". Mythlore. Verifies all claims made.
- Grant, Patrick (1973). "Tolkien: Archetype and Word". Cross Currents (Winter 1973). Verifies all claims made.

Noted.

Nice article, but I am starting to think that psychoanalysts have entirely too much time on their hands. AryKun (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keeps them from doing anything worse! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will be passing. AryKun (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong. 84.216.129.214 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]