Talk:Psilophytopsida

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Name confusions

I've now copied over the only useful information from the former rather confused article titled "Psilophyta" and re-directed it here. I've chosen to use the longer alternative name for the class as the article title (i.e. "Psilophytopsida" rather than "Psilophyta"), but it shouldn't be confused with Psilotopsida, a different class. I've created a disambiguation page at Psilopsida (disambiguation) to which Psilopsida currently redirects. As I was writing the article the four class names (Psilophyta, Psilophytopsida, Psilopsida and Psilotopsida) confused me more than once, and seem confused in some of the literature. I hope the article structure I've set up will clarify, but comments are very welcome. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobox

I deliberately haven't included a taxobox, because for this obsolete class it would be misleading in modern terms. When established and used it was a class of division Pteridophyta (Engler system), but the meaning of this class now has significantly changed. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]