Talk:Pry (novel)

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Electronic literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

some notes for improvement

hello from the wikiconference!

so imo, the major theme for improvement in this article is how it frames facts as original research. maybe try to reframe this as facts, especially the origins and influences. for example, saying that “pry is not the first of its kind” is unsourced. proving that pry wasn't groundbreaking doesn't really belong on wikipedia, instead you could change origins and influences into more of a context of what was happening in the multimedia world when pry was created. for example, if you can any media/people that the creators cited as influences would definitely belong. a key part of this is adding more citations, pretty much everything should be cited. when you say it is influential, you need sources to back that up. what you have in the external links section is a great start - summarizing reviews with small quotations would definitely belong in the reception area though!

more minor things: make sure you're not repeating information too much, like for example the story structure and navigation section is pretty much a repeat of the intro paragraph.

i think you're already working on making the summary more concise, which is great! good work so far, just needs definitely more citations and proving that what you're saying isn't just your own takeaways from experiencing the media, but are more factual.

Hillsyism (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]