Talk:Prunus laurocerasus

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Edible cherries

My grandparents ate laurel cherries when they were young (and poor, just after WW2) and I have personally eaten them several times. They're not delicious, but if you lack food and vitamins as my ancestors did you can apreciate them. Indeed, they're not inedible at all, if you avoid crushing the poisonous seed. Aelwyn 13:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not for pie making...

After reading on here about how Cherry Laurel fruit is edible, we picked 4 cups of them today and pitted them for a pie. We surely didn't crush the pits; however, when I put my nose over the bowl and took a couple of whiffs of the strong smell of bitter almonds I got a little bit light headed. I called poison control to ask what they thought of my pie making idea and they said, "Don't." I have a 4 year old boy who would have loved to eat a couple of slices of the pie tonight. I suffered no ill effects from eating a handful of them the other day; however making a pie is different. Has anyone read Into the Wild? In that Chris dies from making a full meal out of something which was only edible in small portions. Use caution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.122.203 (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobox pic

The current pic seems to be of one of thee dwarf cultivars, not the commonest form. Imc (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Species size

I just made a partial copyedit of this article. I had intended to tackle the whole article, but didn't know what to make of the size measurements currently given, as not only do they seem wrong but they don't match my own (horticultural) source. Can P. laurocerasus really attain 18 metres (nearly 60 feet) in height? And what is anyone to make of those leaf measurements? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of pies

Are we talking about the same plant, with pits rather than "seeds"? The picture looks right. I've made lots of laurel berry pies, eaten 2 or 3 slices at once, and occassionally served them to friends. They taste fine. I've never had any ill effects and no one has told me of having any, I picked a gallon today and put them in the freezer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.191.220 (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prunus laurocerasus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]