Talk:Property Brothers/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 01:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Opening Comments

Welcome to the review for Property Brothers. I will find issues, inform you of them and you will do the work solving them. If necessary I will make very minor edits to fix minor issues. Good luck. TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Issues

• First of all I think a sentence needs added to the lead if there is information on renewal of a current, upcoming, or latest season.
  • I've added that the show's been renewed. Let me know if that is sufficient.
    • Partially Done Is there a sorce?
      • I lifted it from the article where it is sourced. I know sources aren't always needed for the lead, but let me know if you would like me to add it.
• In the infobox there is a link to the Canada HGTV website, if the shows website is different for the U.S. is it possible to add the U.S. link too. (If they're the same or very similar there is no point).
  • Added.
    • Partially Done Looks like it caused a minor issue in the infobox i'll see if i can fix it
      • Let me know if I need to do something else.
• In the production and distribution section there is a source for the shows on Hulu and Amazon is it possible to add one to Netflix?
  • It looks confusing, reference #31 applies to Netflix and Amazon.
    •  Done
• It might especially be good to note whether it is the Canadian Netflix or U.S. Netflix or both considering Netflix carries vastly different content in different countries.
  • Interesting that you mention that, because the original source said the show airs on Netflix on in some reginons. I've updated the article to reflect that.
    •  Done
• From what I can tell Hulu is only available in the United States so maybe split into two different sentences one about U.S. streaming and one for Canadian streaming.
  • I am willing to do this, but the show airs in over 250 countries in a variety of ways, so that was written more as an overview. But if you think it does matter, I'll split it.
    •  Done No need to split it's alright the way it is. I thought that when it was for just U.S. and Can but since it's an overview for all it's the way it is.
• In the reception section is there any info on Canadian reception? Doesn't need a whole paragraph just a sentence or two like the U.S. portion in the same paragraph would be alright.
  • Good point. It is significantly harder to find Canadian info for some reason, but I will definitely investigate that.
    •  Done It'll be alright without them, if you find them later add them in.
• In the list of episodes are there dates to fill in the blanks, and if not is it possible to fill them in with N/A. Also note if the dates in there are the U.S. dates, Canadian dates, or the earliest and latest for both.
  • I'm ashamed to say how much time I've devoted to trying to find those missing dates. I may or may not have called and emailed both the network and production company in Canada, who made promises to get back to me and quickly forgot I exist. I will add "N/A" for now, but my search is not over. Trust me.
    •  Done Works for now. Same thing, if you get them at some point just add them in.

Alright that should be about it for now I'll do a second read through when after some of the issues are addressed. I'm gonna that I'm very surprised by this article, there is a source for almost every sentence in it. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: Thank you for your input and I look forward to any more improvements you may have on the article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 02:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Second Read

@Esprit15d:

• I think it looks good. I'll try and fix the infobox and if you'll add the source for the lead I think that should be the last two things. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @TheDoctorWho:Thank you! Let me know :)
    •  Done

Review Table

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No major spelling or grammar issues noticed
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Follows mos
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	References for almost every sentence in the article
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	No original research
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No copyright violations detected
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Continues with main topic
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Does not into or focus unnecessary detail
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Neutral point of view
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No editwars or major information constantly being removed or added
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images have full fair use rationales filled out
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All images relate to the topic
	7. Overall assessment.	Passed

Closing Comments

@Esprit15d:I'm glad to announce that the article has passed and is now a good article nomination. I will finish up with the instructions listed on Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. Congratulations and let me know if there is ever anything else I can do for you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! It was a pleasure working with you!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 04:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Same to you! A bot should update the page shortly and add the GA top icon.TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)