Talk:Proletarian Revolutionary Organisation, Nepal

A fact from Proletarian Revolutionary Organisation, Nepal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 90 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Proletarian Revolutionary Organisation of Nepal proposed a synthesis of Buddhism and Maoism in 1977?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Length

This [1] was long enough to qualify for DYK? I wouldn't have guessed so. - House of Scandal (talk) 03:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was 2k at the time of discussion dyk, slightly above the minimum limit. It is not a topic around which there is too much literature is availible, but the uniqueness of their political doctrine is quite fascinating. --Soman (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

there was a lot of tags posted on the article, out which only one carried some relevance (Template:one source). There is no argument on the talk page on what would constitute WP:OR, the article has no argument not found in the reference. The BLP tag is also weird, since the article doesn't deal with BLPs. --Soman (talk) 06:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And refimprove and one source are superfluous. --Soman (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]