Talk:Prohibitionism

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Prohibitionism be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Move "Prohibition" to "Prohibition of alcohol"?

The following is copied from Talk:Prohibition:

Maybe this one has been discussed before, I can not quite believe that prohibition of, specifically, alcohol, is the subject of an article under, simply, Prohibition
Maybe it is not so strange to someone whose history is more US than my own
Seems to me the article should be at Prohibition of alcohol, and Prohibition should be a redirect to Prohibitionism (or vice versa)
Laurel Bush (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't about a dictionary definition, but about the specific term definition of Prohibition which is generally used in relation to alcohol. And yes it has been discussed before, and proposed many times, but each time it's decided to leave it at Prohibition. See the archives for the previous discussions. If after reading you still think there is a case, by all means start up a discussion. Canterbury Tail talk 15:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So
I have to remember to use, say, [[Prohibitionism|prohibition]]-based drug control laws rather than [[prohibition]]-based drug control laws?
Seems crazy to me
If we completely disregard dictionary definitions in article titles then getting articles to relate to each other in any meaninful fashion can be rather difficult
Wikipedia turns into more of a jumble than a coherent encyclopaedia
Laurel Bush (talk) 10:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is Prohibition as a term is very commonly used on its own, not just in the US but worldwide, to refer more specifically to the prohibition of alcohol. There is prohibition of other substances and items yes, but when used on its own it is generally academically being used to refer to alcohol without further qualifiers. Canterbury Tail talk 13:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laurel Bush (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prohibitionism (Philosophy of Language)

There should be made a distinction between this concept of prohibitionism and the one put forward by Anderson & Lepore in regards to an account of slur terms and semantic content:

Anderson, Luvell, and Ernie Lepore. "What Did You Call Me? Slurs as Prohibited Words." Analytic Philosophy 54.3 (2013): 350-363. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshmaniac (talk • contribs) 06:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]