Talk:Process
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Geysers
[edit]Geyser can be up to 600 feet when exploding
Apart from the question whether it actually took place or not, isn't it a bit strange to list Allah's creation of Man as a prototypical process and not as an act, as it is widely understood that God certainly had the intention to create when he initiated the whole process. Rinke Hoekstra 09:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move to Process. Joelito (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Process is now a redirect to this page. There is no need for the "(general)" suffix on the page name. --Russ Blau (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Support
[edit]Support move, the disambig page shouldn't have a suffix. HGB 01:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
[edit]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
On Process patentability
[edit]- I think a section on process patentability would be helpful.
- Are processes be subject of patentes? To which extent and which conditions. MX == AGS == --Dagofloreswi (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Singular process
[edit]I removed the example "creation of the universe by God" since it doesn't fit the definition of a process as a trajectory in a system's phase space. I replaced it with a more reasonable example of a singular process. --Shastra 14:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Systemic Functional Linguistics/Grammar
[edit]A process is also a core concept in Systemic Functional Linguistics/Grammar (SFL or SFG) - 'process' is equivalent to 'verb'. There are different kinds of processes - material, behavioural, mental, verbal, existential, relational identifying, and relational attributive. All of these concepts are REALLY important in Applied Linguistics. Anyway, I don't know how to add to the page to include SFL 'process' - could somebody please let me know how? (And how to link to SFL/G?). Thanks. Jess. - 05:36, 1 January 2008 User:58.111.105.143
Please do not revert, Snowded
[edit]I worked hard to follow the practices of Wikipedia:Disambiguation as well as Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages, and Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts. There are guidelines on how to format disambiguation pages, and I studied them carefully and followed them. Please do not revert. Thanks, Star767 (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- ON reflection this about the only one of your mutiple edits which makes sense so I will leave it. ----Snowded TALK 01:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks very kind of you. Thank you so much. Perhaps you will reflect on some of me other edits that you reverted without reflection. You may see that I'm trying to improve quality here. Star767 (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I checked them all, this one was the only where you seemed to be acting reasonably. Be aware that mass changes over multiple articles with polemical edit summaries more or less aways results in your being reverted on sight. ----Snowded TALK 02:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Gregbard has been doing the same thing, reverting the removal of his spamming categories. Even though his spamming is against consensus at the Village Pump. I've never had any problems until I ran into Gregbard and his spamming. You didn't check them all, or you wouldn't have tag team reverted. Star767 (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sigh ----Snowded TALK 02:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Gregbard has been doing the same thing, reverting the removal of his spamming categories. Even though his spamming is against consensus at the Village Pump. I've never had any problems until I ran into Gregbard and his spamming. You didn't check them all, or you wouldn't have tag team reverted. Star767 (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I checked them all, this one was the only where you seemed to be acting reasonably. Be aware that mass changes over multiple articles with polemical edit summaries more or less aways results in your being reverted on sight. ----Snowded TALK 02:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks very kind of you. Thank you so much. Perhaps you will reflect on some of me other edits that you reverted without reflection. You may see that I'm trying to improve quality here. Star767 (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
We need a Management heading ...
[edit]I have come across a number of process articles that have some overlapping scope and therefore are difficult to work with. In particular, Process management, Process-based management are examples. I work in the project management area and find the articles too heavily oriented towards manufacturing. I rearranged the article as follows:
In thermodynamics
[edit](No changes)
In Management
[edit]- Business process, activities that produce a specific service or product for customers
- Process management, ensemble of activities of planning and monitoring the performance of a business process, usually refers to the management of business processes and manufacturing processes.
- Process-based management, is a management approach that views a business as a collection of processes
- Process management (computing), an integral part of any modern-day operating system (OS).
- Process management (Project Management) , a systematic series of activities directed towards causing an end result in engineering activities or project management.[1]
References
- ^ Project Management Institute, Body of Knowledge (PMIBoK), 5th edition, 2013, Section 3, page 47
Other uses
[edit]- Food processing, transformation of raw ingredients, by physical or chemical means into food
- Process philosophy, which regards change as the cornerstone of reality
- Praxis (process), in philosophy, the process by which a theory or skill is enacted or realized
- Process Thinking, a philosophy that focuses on present circumstances.
Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 15:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Rahul Digambar Borole
[edit]Name: Rahul Digambar Borole Nationality: India Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/rahulborole007 Instagram URL: https://instagram.com/rahulborole Twitter URL: https://twitter.com/RahulBorole007 Snapchat URL/Username: https://www.snapchat.com/add/rahulborole Youtube Channel ID: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0X5nUBuBt1y2cPjApBGEow Linked IN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rahul-borole-978a44193 TikTok URL/ID: https://vm.tiktok.com/CnUfuL/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.72.84.136 (talk) 11:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Agro Process Management Book
[edit]One Plot (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Agro Process management is a scientific step by step operation of pre-determined actions using all management principles as a tool in the process with the intention of achieving its set goals most efficiently and effectively.
It can also be defined as infusing all management principles into a tool to carry out a set of activities and tasks arranged together in a step by step order using art and scientifically proven facts relevant to an agribusiness enterprise to meet consumer needs and organizational goals.
There has always been a search for a better and more productive way of getting expected results. This has given rise to the evolution of production style and pattern from home garden cultivation, to field cultivation, to the use of animals to plow farmlands, using a natural water source to irrigate farmlands, and modem day innovations such as the use of First-generation seeds and Genetically Modified Organism for improved expected yield. Basically, looking for the most effective way of increasing yield and making more profit is an endeavor that is common to every practitioner.
The solution is the concept of Agro Process Management. It is a system of agriculture where that involves the input of considerable effort into the production process by incorporating principles of management in its operation. These principles are incorporated in the pre-production, production, and post-production stage of the operation.
It is a well thought out and simplified book that addressed the essential needs of practitioners and incoming actors into the agribusiness industry. Below are the benefits of having this book handy and in your library as an active practitioner.
1. It has the capacity to change practitioners’ perspective from sole dependency on “how to” of the agribusiness industry into Why, What, Where, When, Who, and how. i.e focusing on what you can control within and less focus on what you don’t have the power to change.
2. It speaks the need of the market from the customers’ perspective.
3. It provides management solutions to challenges practitioners had faced over years and had impeded the growth of the industry especially in Africa
4. Changes our mentality from a fixed position (competition) to a growth position (continuous improvement).
5. It helps us to create environments that reduce the rate of risk practitioners are exposed to, in a way to make the industry more attractive and rewarding.
6. It helps to identify the exact need of the industry now and guarantees the possibilities of meeting SDG goals.
7. It gives information on what to do to reduce the year’s youth have to use to learn through difficult experiences towards developing expertise.
8. It introduces the need for process systems in our farming operations and creates easy landing for investors and practitioners.
9. It helps practitioners to have a competitive advantage through market niche creations.
10. It opens the eye of every practitioner to the limitations in Global GAP pursuit.
11. It will increase the rate of success of agribusiness enterprises and reduce the rate of failure.
An old Chinese proverb said, “It is better to take many small steps in the right direction than to make a great leap forward only to stumble backward.”