Talk:Prism (geology)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposed move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move debate was move to Prism (geology). Lox (t,c) 08:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
This article needs to be renamed. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, article names should not be adjectives. This article should be renamed to a noun phrase such as "prismatic mineral" or some such, and "prismatic" could be made to redirect there. I'll leave it to the geologists to suggest the most appropriate name.--Srleffler (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe move it to prism (geology)? It seems to be a different topic from prism (optics) and just plain prism is a dab page. - tameeria (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- I would say Prism (geology) as well. Recury (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Prism (geology) seems a good choice by tameeria & Recury --Lox (t,c) 10:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Sources
[edit]Hopefully the content and sources I've been adding make sense here. Here's a few more that I found that seem to have relevant content: [1][2][3] Dreadstar ☥ 18:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)