Talk:Principality of Nitra/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The blockquote from Annals of Fulda looks odd. I think it is because of the image alongside it. I'm not sure how this can be fixed, but as is it is difficult to discern that the quote is a blockquote and not part of the summary text.

3family6, thank you for your review. I moved the picture. I hope the problem is fixed. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Article contains some ^[who?] tags.

- - - Thank you. The relevant texts are modified. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]

- - - Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law, so I cannot fix the problem. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag.--¿3family6 _contribs 12:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution to the authorship of the following image is lacking: [13]

- - - Sorry, I do not have information on the authorship of the image. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll mark the picture as "anonymous."--¿3family6 _contribs 12:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: Clean up the ^[who?] tags, resolve the formatting/readability issue regarding the one blockquote, and address the minor issues regarding the image tagging. After those issue are resolved, the article will satisy requirements for GA status.--¿3family6 _contribs 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Issues resolved, article passed.--¿3family6 _contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pass/Fail: