Talk:Prehistoric Cornwall

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shining bright work request

If anyone would like to polish things up a bit before this goes to article space... I can think of Austronesier — Sirfurboy — Joe Roe — Ario1234 — पाटलिपुत्र — Firefangledfeathers: Tewdar 12:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or even just tell me which parts you think are crap and I'll change/delete them... Tewdar 13:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made a few minor fixes but this is an excellent page. Compared to the usual um... micro-works that come out of draft, this one is exemplary! You have two tags for sections that could use expansion. I am not sure you need those. You say enough there, and at most I might just expand the existing sentences (e.g. saying there is one example of multiple inhumation burial - you could say where, at least). A stylistic thing that is not an error, but I'll mention, is that you have multiple citations for many sentences. In some cases they make sense because each is to a different example that supports your point, but in general one citation should be enough. Just worth bearing WP:OVERKILL in mind. I didn't want to take any of them out though. I'm happy to take a closer look at any part you want me to. Bronze Age quarrying and metalworking, for instance, but really I think you have it very well covered. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The multiple citations are either (1) required, because I've taken bits of descriptions from multiple sources but don't want to write stuff like "round buildings[1] made from wood[2] with a conical roof[3]" or whatever, or else (2) not required, perhaps because I dumped it in from Cornish Bronze Age, trimmed it, and haven't checked which ones I don't need anymore. But I'll try and get round to fixing that. Feel free to tinker with anything you like, some of the prose could probably use some polishing... the lead's a bit shoddy... etc. 😊 Tewdar 14:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have been asked, I'll gladly fiddle with it. But the article already looks amazing and monumental. Great job. –Austronesier (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It could definitely still be improved, but I'm glad it's in article space at last. Tewdar 21:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully all the sections will have maps one day 😁 Tewdar 22:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low importance?

Really? If Prehistoric Wales is high importance (to Wikiprojects Wales, Archaeology , and History) and History of Cornwall is high (to Wikiproject Cornwall) and mid (to Wikiproject History), surely it should be at least 'mid' for Wikiproject Cornwall anyway. I'd change it myself but it might look I am somehow biased, since I wrote most of the article, my username uses the Cornish colours, and there's a big Cornish flag on my userpage. 😁 Tewdar 20:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article, that was some work Tewdar. Hopefully you could protect it to keep vandals from adding in Engerland everywhere. What is their problem, some kind of pathological hatred one presumes. Chons da sos 85.94.248.27 (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No one has a 'pathological hatred' here, we just represent a neutral point of view ((If you want to truly see what a "pathological hatred" looks like, ask the average Cornish nationalist what they think of Devon)). Generally speaking, most of prehistoric Cornwall has little to do with modern Cornwall. No Celts, no Cornish language. nada. Same with England. And the fact that Cornwall is considered to be a part of England is contentious to some for sure - but very much a reality. --SinoDevonian (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]