Talk:Preformationism

A fact from Preformationism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that before the 17th century, it was believed that all organisms grew from miniature versions of themselves that had existed since the beginning of creation?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Philosophy: Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Harvey

I revamped a lot of stuff on Harvey in the philosophical development section. It was unclear to begin with, as it said that Harvey was an epigenesist in one sentence and a preformationist in the next. The confusion makes sense; Harvey did place a lot of importance on eggs. After changing that, I had to rejigger the rest of the section too. I think that takes care of the clarifyme that's been hanging there since last year. Ceramufary (talk) 06:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anecdotic

I move this here, I think it belongs rather to the entry on Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (see WP:TRITE):

"Living at a time when sin was virtually synonymous with crime, he was careful to note that his semen samples came from "the excess with which nature provided me in my conjugal relations," and not "sinful contrivance."" (Magner 160)

Lapaz 19:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out-of-Place Statement

I removed the following sentence: "Because of religious creationist bias that pervaded research at the time, preformationists held onto their theories in the face of contravening evidence." My reason is that the paragraphs preceding and following the sentence show that observations seemed to support preformationist theory. The preceding paragraph states that Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Joseph de Aromatari, Marcello Malpighi and Jan Swammerdam all made observations supporting preformation theory. Then, the last sentence in that paragraph is this statement, that, despite contravening evidence, the creationists kept preformationism alive. OK, *what* contravening evidence? None was listed in the paragraph leading up to that point. In fact, the preceding paragraph makes the point that nearly 2 centuries would pass before any theory could explain the lack of evidence for epigenist theory, when the cell theory came along. The paragraph following the sentence that I removed quotes Leeuwenhoek throwing an anvil to the epigenist theory. So, I removed that sentence because it does not fit in with any of the surrounding text. Pooua (talk) 05:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homunculus

I'm changing the line about Nicolas Hartsoeker calling his drawing a homunculus. Hartsoeker actually referred to "petit l'infant" or "le petit animal" and never used the term homunculus. Pinto-Correia thinks this is an important point, since you don't start seeing the term homunculus used to describe the little performed person until F. J. Cole's 1934 "Early Theories of Sexual Generation." There's more good info about Hartsoeker here: Essai de Dioptrique Ceramufary (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]