Talk:Precision Lightweight GPS Receiver

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Military history: Technology / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

it should be mentioned that there is also a PLGR II version. It looks fairly much different to the orignal plgr 96 shown in the picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.3.24.196 (talk) 13:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DAGR versus PLGR - contradictory introduction dates - 1990 or 1994? Or neither?

In the Defense_Advanced_GPS_Receiver article the year nominated as the introduction of the PLGR is stated as 1994:

"The DAGR replaced the Precision Lightweight GPS Receiver (PLGR), which was first fielded in 1994."

However the PLGR article Precision_Lightweight_GPS_Receiver states 1990:

"Introduced in January 1990, and extensively fielded until 2004 when it was replaced by its successor, the Defense Advanced GPS Receiver (DAGR)."

Which is correct, 1990 or 1994? Or neither?

I will post this same concern to the DAGR talk article.

DNSLOC (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use in Canadian military

I know I used the PLGR in the Canadian Army in the mid-late 2000s. I was trained on it in 2005, but I don't have hard dates for when it was replaced by the DAGR. Will try and find out. lostmuskrat (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Precision Lightweight GPS Receiver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722183355/https://gps.army.mil/gps/CustomContent/gps/ue/plgr.htm to https://gps.army.mil/gps/CustomContent/gps/ue/plgr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]