Talk:Prabuddha Bharata

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swami Vivekananda Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swami Vivekananda, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swami Vivekananda on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Swami VivekanandaWikipedia:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaTemplate:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaSwami Vivekananda articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in 10 September 2018.

List of contributors

I've removed the list. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of links. Such a long list of contributors does not belong in an article about a journal, particularly as it is unsourced. Is there any third-party source that gives this list of contributors? If not, then assembling the list is [[WP:OR]|original research]], and hence not allowed on Wikipedia. Finally, we do not make external links inside article text - if you want to make a link to another Wikipedia article, then use the proper markup [[ ]]. --RexxS (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My full support. This has been discussed ad nauseam on my Talk page, clearly to no avail. — kashmiri ^TALK 16:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have not edited this article - I saw some edits to it in the Recent Changes log and looked it up - and so I'm pretty uninvolved, though I just edited the article to remove the list yet again. I agree entirely with RexxS. Wikipedia's readers do not benefit from long unwieldly lists of information, and when then list is unsourced and appears to be, at best, original research, it's clearly inappropriate. --bonadea contributions talk 17:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]