Talk:Powership
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Powership article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Powership appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge with powerbarge
[edit]These seem to be covering much the same topic, from a quick scan. User A1 (talk) 08:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support along with a rename of the new article to floating power station. Smartse (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support; iirc I made that suggestion already when the article was reviewed for DYK, as the actual differences are still not clear to me. -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 02:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Help with USN submarines helping US disasters -- Jack
[edit]Folks, In my trolling of magazines, I came across where there was a disaster in some US coastal city and the USN hooked one of their new large submarines into the local power grid. I have made a reference to that after my paragraph on the 1st commercial powership in the US. I am going to see if I can find the reference on the USN submarines, but any help would be much appreciated. Jack Jackehammond (talk) 08:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Powership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310204805/http://www.jotun.com.tr/www/tr/20040053.nsf?OpenDatabase&db=%2Fwww%2Ftr%2F20040054.nsf&v=14A6&e=tr&c=CDA29667E2E579D6C2257704003F8471 to http://www.jotun.com.tr/www/tr/20040053.nsf?OpenDatabase&db=%2Fwww%2Ftr%2F20040054.nsf&v=14A6&e=tr&c=CDA29667E2E579D6C2257704003F8471
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031230849/http://www.gbcghana.com/1.8407975 to http://gbcghana.com/1.8407975
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)