Talk:Power Shift (conference)

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Power Shift should not necessarily be redirected to Power Shift(TV) as there are other possible searches, and probably more likely searches, that are not this article. I would propose that the redirect either be deleted altogether or go to Power Shift 2009.

(Alevihnc (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

In the end it makes more sense to use Power Shift as the article for the 2007 and 2009 youth climate conferences and not redirect it anywhere.

(Alevihnc (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Add partner 350.org link , also see cross-reference [1] http://www.350.org/friends

Add partner 350.org link , also see cross-reference [2] http://www.350.org/friends —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.37.84.188 (talk) 23:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? There are many "partners" of both organizations, why include that one? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous "See also" links

I question the relevance of the following links in the "See also" section:

— Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon pricing results in the value of Wind turbine viability as compared to puffing carbon from underground and making a sewer of the Atmosphere of Earth, and not compensating for the use of Ecosystem services, per Scientific opinion on climate change. The balance tip is the Economics of global warming. Clear? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear that you're trying to link articles you consider important, regardless of relevance. I would say that that could support individual and political action on climate change only. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to start bolding and italicizing Arthur, I can read. Let's keep this civilized. The two of us may agree-to-disagree ... Help me understand, from your "tone" of writing, why wouldn't I link articles I see as relevantly related. Do you try to unlink articles regardless of relevance? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear that they aren't related. Even that (quasi-)paragraph, although strained, would only fit in economics of global warming, not here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting point. If you are done (Special:Contributions/Arthur_Rubin), I am done. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of Ecosystem Services Valuation (Natural capital) Environmental finance interest?

Ecosystem Services: How People Benefit from Nature by Rebecca L. Goldman, currently in print.

Some excerpts: "... Economists refer to this full valuation as shadow pricing, but even an informal, “back-of-the envelope” calculation of all values can help to illustrate the importance of ecosystem services in our daily lives. ... due to Colony collapse disorder (CCD). The disappearance of the honey bee would have catastrophic financial outcomes, since it is the most economically valuable pollinator worldwide.[17] ... How Are Ecosystem Service Approaches Being Leveraged?... books such as The New Economy of Nature[40] and interdisciplinary scholarly investigations such as the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) demonstrating the ecosystem alternatives to resource problems. ... 14. W. Reid, “Nature: The Many Benefits of Ecosystem Services,” Nature (journal) 443 (2006): 749; R. L. Goldman, H. Tallis, P. Kareiva, and G. C. Daily, “Field Evidence That Ecosystem Service Projects Support Biodiversity and Diversify Options,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008): 9445–9448. ... [29.] J. Jowit, “UN Says Case for Saving Species ‘More Powerful Than Climate Change,’” May 21, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/may/21/un-biodiversity-economic-report. ... E.B. Barbier, E.W. Koch, B.R. Silliman, S.D. Hacker, E. Wolanski, J. Primavera, E.F. Granek, S. Polasky, S. Aswani, L.A. Cramer, D.M. Stoms, C.J. Kennedy, D. Bael, C.V. Kappel, G.M. Perillo, D.J. Reed, “Coastal Ecosystem-Based Management with Nonlinear Ecological Functions and Values,” Science (journal) 319 (2008): 321–323 ... B. K. Jack, C. Kousky, and K. R. E. Sims, “Designing Payments for Ecosystem Services: Lessons from Previous Experience with Incentive-Based Mechanisms,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (2008): 9465–9470. [36.] D. Perrot-Maître, “The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A “Perfect” PES Case?” (London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 2006); N. Asquith and S. Wunder, Payments for Watershed Services: The Bellagio Conversations (Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia: Fundación Natura Bolivia, 2008); S. Engel, S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder, “Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues,” Ecological Economics 65 (2008): 663–674; Jack et al., note 35; G. C. Daily and P. Matson, “Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Implementation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008): 9455–9456. [37.] K. A. Brauman, G. C. Daily, T. K. Duarte, and H. A. Mooney, “The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32 (2007): 67–98; K. M. Krchnak, Watershed Valuation as a Tool for Biodiversity Conservation (Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy, 2007); Asquith and Wunder, note 36; I. Porras, M. Greig-Gran, and N. Neves, “All that Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries,” Natural Resource Issues No. 11 (London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 2008). [39.] For more information on water funds, see R. L. Goldman, S. Benitez, A. Calvache, and A. Ramos, Water Funds: Protecting Watersheds for Nature and People (Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy, 2010). [40.] G. Daily and K. Ellison, The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to make Conservation Profitable (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002).

99.29.186.178 (talk) 01:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong article. Nothing to do with this article about the organization Power Shift. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify "movement" with movement

Clarify "movement" with movement. 99.181.145.53 (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK? What else could it be? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. 99.119.128.35 (talk) 23:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How much?

Interesting movement. I'd be very interested to know how much the young people are paying to attend these conferences. Any information? (Farawaychris (talk) 11:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

usually to get in as a general admin in the U.S. it has been about $60ish (some discounts for group rates) for that national conferences (+ food and lodging which are separate). Local conferences are usually about half that price at least when the Energy Action Coalition (EAC) are organizing it Kayz911 (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Power Shift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]