Talk:Potassium titanyl phosphate

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Prostatectomy#Laser prostate surgery|laser prostate surgery]] The anchor (#Laser prostate surgery) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

medical use

Should we not mention or link to more about its medical use in so called 'KTP lasers' eg Endoscopic 532-nm KTP laser excision of inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses ? Rod57 (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links appropriate ?

The external links are to two companies selling PTP products. They do have some (limited) information on the material but nothing that couldn't be referenced as a reference. They are not even industry leading manufacturers so its not clear why they should be singled out as a 'further reading' type of link. Its not clear why links to a commercial supplier are encyclopaedic and I'm not sure if there is much of a public interest in keeping them there. If there are no strong objections I will remove these links. --150.203.48.199 (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry forgot to login before signing... --Fincle (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Figure

I am happy to provide better figures than the one provided. Is there any preference about the unit cell to use? Cippo1987 (talk) 16:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]