This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
When I first noticed "iunior" in the text, I went to change it to "Junior". Then I saw it was in the text three times, so it was clearly deliberate. Well I did some searching. It turns out that "Postumus Junior" (the name of the article) is far more common than "Postumus Iunior". It does seem that learned pedants prefer "Iunior". However, in all my web searching, every time I found "Postumus iunior" (small i) it was either a WikiClone or in some other language. Therefore I have changed the article to use the proper pedantic form "Postumus Iunior". — Randall Bart18:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's Latin. English-speaking pedants have adopted the (IMO) stupid convention that Latin's consonantal i should be written as i, whereas consonantal u should be written as v. The word simply means (and could perfectly well be rendered as) "the younger". We probably should do that, in the spirit of using English.
More troubling, however, is the way that the article obfuscates the very strong probability that Postumus the Younger is a fiction. Q·L·1968☿19:06, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now moved the page from 'Postumus Junior' to 'Postumus the Younger', and rephrased the article to make it clear that this person probably did not exist. Q·L·1968☿19:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
