Talk:Portland Wind Farm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portland Wind Farm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Portland Wind Farm is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Update

Obviously, some of the information on the Pacific Hydro site needs an update, expected completion third quarter 2005 is no longer current! Either it happened or it didn't! I have emailed them asking for the latest information. Andrewa 18:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent capacities

The sum of the nameplate powers of the four stages seems to add to 179 MW, not 195 MW. Is there a missing stage, or was one of the later stages downgraded?