Talk:Port of Rijeka/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 17:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Small fixes needed

Hello! I am almost finished with the review, and there are two small items that need to be addressed:

• In the "Transport facilities" section the acronyms "DIOKI" and "DINA" are used, but I can find nowhere in the article stating what those acronyms mean. Please define those terms. Thanks. --Tea with toast (話) 18:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• "DIOKI" and "DINA-petrokemija" (DINA-petrochemical) are actually company names normally spelled uppercase - see their websites [1], [2]. The two terms were originally coined as acronyms but those are not used neither officially by company registries, nor the companies themselves or press anymore - rather the names are now treated as proper names. Please also note that DINA-petrokemija is owned by DIOKI.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying. I assumed that since JANAF was an acronym, the others might be too. --Tea with toast (話) 02:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Tea with toast (話) 02:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)