Talk:Port Gamble, Washington

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

History wording

A couple of passages caught my eye, or rather one did (the first one) while I was looking at the esecond one, which I wrote originally:

The body of water was named by the Wilkes expedition in 1841 after U.S. Navy Lt. Robert Gamble. The community, originally known as Teekalet, was founded as a company town by Josiah Keller, William Talbot, and Andrew Pope's Puget Mill Company in 1853.[4]

"The commnnity, originally known as Teekalet...." - it's important to state whether there was a Native American community at the location and Teekalet was its name, or the location was named Teekalet; and in which language (Lushoosteed presumably) and what it means is kind of also needed.....Skookum1 (talk) 15:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In 1856, The USS Massachusetts was sent from Seattle to Port Gamble, Washington Territory on Puget Sound, where indigenous raiding parties from British and Russian territories had been raiding and enslaving local Native Americans

I wanated to note/comment that this was an alliance of Haida and "Tongas"....when I've seen reference to these raids in BC history it's spelled Tongass and I've always associated that reference with the Tlingit; but one of the sources identified the "Tongas" as Tsimshisan. I'm not saying that's right, as white people misperceive/misrecord tribal name stuff all the time; it's just the raiding parties shoudl be identified; the point about British/Russian territory is to do with why there was no pursuit possible (even if ships fast enough to compete with hte canoes for speed were available) by the US; the British could not pursue, though sympathetic, because of a lack of armamanent capable of taking on the Tongass-Haida alliance, and again a lack of ships; this all seemed too copmlicated to give here, maybe I have some of it in the Isaac Ebey article; the British outposts in and around Victoria were themselves vulnerable, relative t o the sacle of native popluations at the time; it wasn't until after the smallpox epidemic of the 1860s that Britain was really able to assert some kind of control along the coast north of Georgia Strait; ironically the plague was spread northwards by north coast peoples who had congregated at Victoria as part of plan to exterminate white people, which kind of fizzled due to Douglas' diplomacy/posturing; smallpox appeared and they all headed back to their villages, bringing the dieease with them.....Skookum1 (talk) 15:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that whole paragraph has mistakes and problems and should be rewritten. I'll try to find time to do it. The main source given is Beth Gibson, Beheaded Pioneer, Laura Arksey, Columbia, Washington State Historical Society, Tacoma, Spring, 1988, but that URL says "Hometown Has Been Shutdown. Posted on Nov 6th 2008 1:30PM ... We're sorry to inform you that as of Oct. 31, 2008, AOL® Hometown was shut down permanently." So if nothing else the footnote can be deleted unless the content exists somewhere else). The other source given is Bancroft's 1890 history book, with a mention of the raiders being Stikine/Tlingit--which is what my sources say as well. There are some other issues, at least according to the book I am reading, which says the Tlingit raiding party (from Kupreanof Island) went to southern Puget Sound and "harassed native villages" near Steilacoom. Then, returning north they stopped at Port Gamble, beaching their canoes. Some of the Tlingit's "relatives worked at the mill" at Port Gamble. Apparently their visit was for friendly purposes. The commander of the gunboat Massachusetts asked, via an interpreter, for the Tlingit to leave "peacefully in tow of this vessel". The Tlingit declined, perhaps "defiantly" and "tauntingly". One thing led to another and before long the gunboat opened fire and a shore party attacked, killed many including a chief, destroyed the canoes, etc. The Tlingit "sued for peace" after "48 hours" (surprisingly long time) and the gunboat took 87 of them to Victoria, from which they eventually got back to Alaska. They were warned, apparently by Governor Douglas, never to return to Puget Sound. But in next summer they did, "bent on vengeance for their dead chief". That was when they killed Isaac Ebey on Whidbey Island. Anyway, I will try to find time to write this up better and rewrite that paragraph. 21:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Merger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus for merge. Better to merge first and then do corrections, because it's easier to work on 1 article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the two pages should be merged. There are better footnotes undergirding Port Gamble, Mill Town and those need to be preserved during the mergerElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 14:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A merge appears appropriate - but the recent attempt was a simple cut/paste, resulting in redundant content and mangled formatting. I've undone it for now until a better thought-out and correctly structured merge can be performed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, after a quick review, Port Gamble, Mill Town does contain several useful links; but it is not written from an encyclopedic tone, instead written more as a narrative story. Before merging, much of that content will need to be trimmed to just the encyclopedic facts without the narrative storyline. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Port Gamble, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420121245/http://www.treefarmsystem.org/cms/pages/20_5.html to http://www.treefarmsystem.org/cms/pages/20_5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transportation

Usually most cities get a section for Transportation including what highways, railroads, airports, bridges, etc. serve it. Should we add one for Port Gamble? I know it's more of a historical location and current unincorporated community, but I think it would be valuable to include that it is on an important route (104) between the Edmonds-Kingston Ferry and the Olympic Peninsula, US 101, via the Hood Canal Floating bridge. Boucher4 (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]