Talk:Porkbusters

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 October 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Porkbusters is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2005 comment

I added a link to what looks like the official begining of the project. http://instapundit.com/archives/025618.php The paragraph could probably use some cleaning up, but I thought I would include that link for now. --Viper Daimao 20:57, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I added a link to a search page on Instapundit returning all posts containing "Porkbusters". Glenn has been posting the responses from representatives that people have been sending him. --Viper Daimao 20:57, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coburn Amendment

I added some quick info about the coburn amendment, which the project seems to be focusing attention at the moment. Also, I added a link to the pdf of the amendment in the External links section. If anyone knows how to add one of those little superscript numbered links that link to the bottom, please add one along side "Coburn Amendment" in the paragraph.--Viper Daimao 14:05, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else want to smack the crap out of every U.S. Senator who voted against the amendment? Or who agree with all this pork barrel stuff. Why are politicians so stupid? Even more so when money is involved. Quit using my money to pay for absolute crap! I just don't get it. ARGH!!! It just makes me so frustrated!!! Okay, sorry bout that, I had to vent. Back to work. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)} 15:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"There’s No Defending Pork"

Senator Coburn has a National Review article by this title dated May 17, 2007. He says lots of interesting things; perhaps we should quote some of them. (He seems to be a little unhappy with some of his fellow congresspeople, and not just the Dems!) Cheers, CWC 16:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

We should bring this article up to date.

Here's some references we could use:

"House Republicans claim victory in earmark reform showdown" by Rep John Boehner, Washington Examiner, Jun 14, 2007
House Reaffirms Reforms On Earmarks" by Gail Russell Chaddock of the Christian Science Monitor, June 15, 2007

Cheers, CWC 11:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Porkbusters.net

Someone's added back an EL to Porkbusters.net, a website which carries links to pork-related news items. I see from dnsstuff.com that it is hosted in Germany, whereas the official site (porkbusters.org) is hosted in Wisconsin. I suspect that the .net site is not really part of Porkbusters. Does anyone know for sure? CWC 10:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meme?

I'm all for the goal of the project, but can this really be considered an "internet meme?" Gregly (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Porkbusters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]