Talk:Population
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Population article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2nd sentence is bizarre
[edit]"Individuals within a population share a factor may be reduced by statistical means, but such a generalization may be too vague to imply anything."
(What the hell?)
--Tyranny Sue (talk) 06:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Another incomprehensible sentence is the last in the "Control" section: "To control of population structure,it measures through efficient mixed-model association (EMMA) method, which corrects for population structure and genetic relatedness in model organism association mapping." These garbled sentences should be rewritten or removed. Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Lets split the article
[edit]The article refers to human population. We should split it into "Population (biology)" and into "Population". First paragraph is about population in biology. Teilolondon (talk) 08:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. danielkueh (talk) 02:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class Ecology articles
- Mid-importance Ecology articles
- WikiProject Ecology articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Statistics articles
- Mid-importance Statistics articles
- WikiProject Statistics articles
- C-Class geography articles
- Mid-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles