Talk:Pooley Sword
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pooley Sword article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lifted almost verbatim from the website
[edit]The first paragraph of this article is lifted almost word for word from the www.pooleysword.com website front page. I didn't bother checking any further than that. 174.116.71.90 (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.116.71.90 (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- I noticed that too. I suspect most available material is primary--I didn't feel up to tracking down more detached sources, but I did have a go at eliminating the worst of the adulatory language. Patronanejo (talk) 01:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Sharks endangered
[edit]I find it odd the suggestion that grips are made from rays because sharks are endangered, when some 75 million sharks are killed a year for Chinese shark fin soup. Surely one a year can be spared for sword grips.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Sussex-related articles
- Low-importance Sussex-related articles
- WikiProject Sussex articles