Talk:Pondicherry-class minesweeper

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pondicherry-class minesweeper article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Proposed merge with INS Karwar (M67)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) DBig Xrayᗙ 10:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

. This ship belongs to that class. It does not have much different information then already mentioned on that page. It will be easier to make this one page for maintenance. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Very little content on the article is specific to the ship INS Karwar. —Gazoth (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The remaining two articles on individual ships of the class, INS Pondicherry (M61) and INS Kozhikode (M71) should be merged into this article too for the same reason. —Gazoth (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge(s) on the grounds that warships are usually notable (see WP:MILUNIT). I've also added some material specific to the ship, which was straightforward to find - there seems to be an adequate number of sources to justify independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for the same reasons as mentioned by Klbrain. Class article and ship article are independently notable and can be expanded based on their own content. --DBig Xrayᗙ 10:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ship is individually notable Lyndaship (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the consensus for independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 08:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Klbrain, agree please use the template at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Closing_instructions to close this --DBig Xrayᗙ 08:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry: there is no close template at your link. Perhaps the following will do. Klbrain (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Klbrain here Wikipedia:Simple_RM_closing_instructions--DBig Xrayᗙ 10:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.