Talk:Pollice verso

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It's demonstrated that this symbol is not corroborated by any document (pictures, writings...). So this picture helps broadcasting this myth about gladiators. There is, too, a theory that says that the thumb down indicates exactly the opposite, that the man needs to keep on live.

-)

I saw something about this on the History Channel. Thumbs up meant "run him through" & thumbs down meant "throw down your swords." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.134.7 (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's many sites that support this, with quotes from antiquity even. Here's one: http://wordinfo.info/unit/3735/ip:1/il:K —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.134.7 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another from 1932 that already assumes the popular notion of 'thumbs up' to be incorrect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Punch_Free_Trade.jpg 69.207.128.243 (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, This Whole Thing Needs Fixing

This article (as of August 2010) is WORTHLESS. The writing style is rather childish and there are no citations for anything. It all seems to spill out of the unsophisticated mind of the author. I don't feel I can trust anything in this article. Maybe there are truthful statements here (maybe it's all true) but there is too much missing and the quality is too poor for me to believe any of it. Gingermint (talk) 01:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Juvenal Satire III

The article mentions Juvenal's Satire III. While it does use "verso pollice" and thus should be included in the article, it doesn't say anything about which direction of the thumb indicates which result.--Mrcolj (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pliny and "Pollice Presso"

Apparently Pliny's use of Pollice Presso, if it can be established as the opposite of Pollice Verso, is a huge hint. No time to do it myself.--Mrcolj (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Implied question

Even if we assume that thumbs up meant "yes" and thumbs down meant "no" then as they would today, there is still the issue of what the implied question was. Is the victorious gladiator asking "Shall I allow my defeated opponent to live?" or "Shall I kill my defeated opponent?"? JRSpriggs (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

To add to this article: more detail about the findings of scholar Anthony Corbeill about this subject, such as is discussed in the current version of the Thumb signal article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]