Talk:Politics of Croatia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 23:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to complete this review bit by bit over the next few days. --Tea with toast (話) 23:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Well done! My congratuations to the editors for crafting a fine article. I like the organization, and am pleased to find that the article has comprehensive coverage with out going into needless details. I only have 2 suggestion for further changes:

In the "Elections" section, there is mention of "other minorities" that receive two or more MPs. Is it worth listing these minority groups?
If possible, I think it would be very relevant to include a section on the various political parties in Croatia.

Congratulations and good luck. --Tea with toast (話) 03:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Regarding 1, I thought it would yield a more comprehensive coverage. Regarding 2, I'll have a look at it shortly. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]