Talk:Policraticus

Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Social and political / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy
	Medieval philosophy

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

There are actually many justifications of tyrannicide that predate that of John's. Cicero's, in the wake of Julius Caesar's assassination, is probably the most famous:

"What more atrocious crime can there be than to kill a fellow-man, and especially an intimate friend? But if anyone kills a tyrant — be he never so intimate a friend — he has not laden his soul with guilt, has he? The Roman People, at all events, are not of that opinion; for of all glorious deeds they hold such a one to be the most noble." (Cicero, De Officiis, Book III, 19-20) Terrasirradient 23:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot -- I changed it to "after antiquity," which I think gets more into the "Middle Ages" part of it.--Idols of Mud 16:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]