Talk:Supercop

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (18)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,053)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,475) • Stub-Class articles (6,684)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

DVD releases

The best way to compare the DVD releases will be by their respective running times if only I could find them.--Darrelljon 15:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Darrelljon 16:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone heard about the Zoke Culture Bootleg DVD? I heard it may be a Megastar reprint.--Darrelljon 20:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page to Supercop at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 12:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Police Story 3: Super Cop → Supercop – This is the clear WP:COMMONNAME. It's the US title and the revised UK title. The Australian title is still "Police Story 3: Supercop", but that's outweighed by the US and UK. 94.3.180.110 (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)—Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 05:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support alternate move to Supercop (film). Move Supercops to Supercop instead. The name is too vague to have the film be primary._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's any argument that the film isn't the clear primary topic, since there is literally nothing else called "Supercop"... 94.3.180.110 (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least a couple of police figures have been referred to as "supercop" by the news media, and the term itself for the movie was based on the real life use of the term to nickname certain high profile cops. I don't think the movie is the obvious primary topic over actual police officers with that nickname._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of that at Supercops... 94.3.180.110 (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:841A:77E6:DFCE:FEBE (talk) 16:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. I think this is the primary topic, nothing else on the Supercops page seems to be as relevant, and it is the WP:COMMONNAME. — Amakuru (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Too much weigh on Western sources using one-word title?

ChannelNewsAsia used the previous title. So do Today (Singapore), The Richest, Horror Cult Films. Cinema Blend uses both "Police Story 3" and "Supercop". So do Cheat Sheet (which emphasizes the previous title more). Am I overreacting to the change and (over)emphasis on Western sources using the current title? --George Ho (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're overreacting. The current title is supported by WP:COMMONNAME. 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:399C:E35B:C026:BE7C (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources (recent and 2010s, and undated):

Police Story 3: Supercop (or Super Cop): Oscars.org (also uses just "Supercop" after using the full title), Film at Lincoln Center (also uses just "Supercop" for the flow), Indiewire, American Cinematheque (also one of partners of Beyond Fest), Charge (third-party YouTube clips don't count), Planet S (also uses "Supercop" just to refer to the US dub version), South China Morning Post, NBC News, Hybrid Network, YardBarker, Newsweek, Slashfilm blog, Inquirer.net (Philippines), Ars Technica, InStyle
Just "Supercop" (or "Super Cop"): The Beat, It's Just Movies, Wizard World, Silicon Republic, Vice, DigBoston, BET, Deadspin, Vulture (also uses just "Police Story 3" as alternative title), AceShowbiz (which is blacklisted here, so can't provide link), Elle
Uses both titles: Deseret, Bulletproof Action (though it's a self-published blog), AV Club (also uses just "Police Story 3"), Spectrum Culture (uses just "Supercop" more often for shorter reference), one book (but puts the full title first)

According to my research, both the full and short titles are commonly used recently. Please tell me that I'm wrong and that you have sources proving otherwise. George Ho (talk) 20:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]