This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Text and/or other creative content from [nil ] was copied or moved into [[]]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I propose that Podophyllin be merged into Podophyllotoxin. I think that the content in the Podophyllin article can easily be explained in the context of Podophyllotoxin, and the Podophyllotoxin article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Podophyllin will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. The original source of the Podophyllin article was the 1911 edition of Encycopedia Britannica. The primarily useful compound from podphyllin has been characterized and isolated since then, and it is Podophyllotoxin. Tentrillion (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
