Talk:Place Eugène Flagey

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article relates to Brussels, and should follow the Brussels naming conventions.

Move page?

Place Flagey is used much more often in English. ([1] vs [2]) More troubling is that Flagey Square seems to me to be an awkward neologism, and even Place Flagey would be easy for English speakers to understand. "Flagey Place" would also be better than the current name. Oreo Priest ^talk 21:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contra Its quite clear Oreo Priest would like Brussels to be a 100% Francophone city. Do you work for the UF?

That's simply not true. I'm an English speaker that's lived in Brussels, and I just think the titles of the articles should reasonably reflect what anglophones actually call them. Having said that, would you have any problem with Flagey Place? Oreo Priest ^talk 04:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pro I am admittedly no expert, but I have spent 18 months in Brussels and have never once heard it referred to as "Flagey Square." Anglophones, at least among the expat community universally seem to call it "Place Flagey". Internet usage also seems to support the extensive use of "Place Flagey." This is not political in any way, as we would surely be pushing for "Flageyplein" in that case... Peregrine981 (talk) 22:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ixelles (Bruxelles) Le Flagey.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ixelles (Bruxelles) Le Flagey.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ixelles (Bruxelles) Le Flagey.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Place Flagey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]