Talk:Pink Season

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:03, November 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Genre

Obviously, I'm pretty new at this, so I am just wondering about the "credibility" of sources allowed to justify the "Genre" tag. If I could be redirected to a page, or told what constitutes "critical reception." If I were to use the genre tags from a well known critic who reviewed it, would that constitute "independent reliable source with critical reception"? Thank you. GabetheEditor (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GabetheEditor: Critical reception refers to critic reviews usually included in a critial reception section. See WP:ALBUM/SOURCES for information on (un)acceptable music sources. Genres discussed in that section (or elsewhere in the body of the article) should be included in the lead and the infobox. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 February 2020

This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 9 March 2020. The result of the move review was overturn to move.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~~The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 13:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Overturned to move. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Excluding an EP that consists entirely of remixes of some of this album's tracks (and doesn't have the exact title Pink Season), the only other topic listed at the dab page is another album. This album seems like a primary topic compared to the other album; for starters, the Apink album only charted in Japan, whereas the Pink Guy album made eleven charts in seven countries. Also, when the view counts are compared, the Apink album's measly 21,589 since this album was released doesn't even come close to the Pink Guy album's 364,506. Finally, Google Trends shows that while interest in the Pink Guy album has dropped significantly since it peaked at release in 2017 (the only argument against this album being the primary topic I've found so far), and the Apink album is a popular search term in a few (mostly non-English-speaking) countries, this album is still far more popular.ⓋᎯ☧ǿᖇǥ@ℤε 💬 14:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Jerm (talk) 03:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose no primary here In ictu oculi (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Adding in the EP, which could conceivably be known as "Pink Season", the album still has 75% of pageviews. But considering that the EP is just a remix of the album, the Pink Guy topics combine for 95% of pageviews. That's a primary topic for the album either way. And no significance issues. Dohn joe (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

STFU by Pink Guy

There is a song by Pink Guy called "STFU", which was released as a single music video on 23 September 2016. I have added it as a single to the infobox. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]