User talk:GabetheEditor

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#AnEditorNameA

I believe "reverted" in your first sentence should read "referred". Meters (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are so very right, thank you! I'm GabetheEditor! Talk to me (here). 23:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLPPROD reverted

Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have reverted a BLPPROD you placed on Eugeny Kenig. The article contained a valid link. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPP

Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but critical maintenance tasks are not for new users. Please refrain from patrolling new pages until you have significantly more experience and understand the complex tutorial and our deletion policies.

If you would like to help out with something less challenging, as soon as you have 200 mainspace edits you will qualify to enroll at the WP:CVUA where you can learn all about combating vandalism which needs all the help we can get. When you graduate from there, you will be able to apply for the Rollbacker tool. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMB Insurance Services

Hi, just wanted to drop you a note about this AfD. Someone with a conflict of interest isn't outright prohibited from writing about a topic they're involved with. Therefore saying an article should be deleted because an involved party wrote it isn't a valid reason for deletion.

In this case, their article merits deletion, but for other reasons. The sources given are a combination of primary sources (company's own website) or company-authored press release-like material. Those don't satisfy the notability criteria for companies, which demands significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources.

The user who wrote it also violated the WP:CORPNAME section of the username policy, but that's a separate matter... --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that it was speedy deleted under the WP:G11 criteria... so that's that. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I made an error in placing my AfD, I realize now. I'll make better SD template chice in the future ;) GabetheEditor^(talk_cont) 15:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

I just wanted to let you know I reverted your edit to that archive because they were already blocked and it messed up my edits that were already existing. For future reference, if you'd like to file one, it'll need to be outside of the archive as a new report or in addition to a currently new report and identified as written by you, rather than editing another editor's content. Cheers! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page with something wrong

Hi GabetheEditor, I'm so sorry if I did something wrong. I have tried to correct the page and I hope to have done well. I think the page is useful because we are two Italian directors with the same name. Best and thanks for help me Giuseppe Ferlito (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're good man, I removed my speedy deletion template because it conforms to notability. I know the article is about you, or someone close to you; you can do so only if you are notable enough to warrant a page. Just make sure you can get a credible source to contribute to the page, and if you continue editing, do not violate neutral point of view. (See WP:POV) Best! GabetheEditor^(talk_cont) 16:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GabetheEditor thank you so much for explaining and helping me, I'll do it! You are really kind, Best Giuseppe Ferlito (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GabetheEditor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]