Talk:Pin Ups/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Pin Ups. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Pin Ups → Pinups (album) – The title is "Pinups", not "Pin Ups". There was an extensive discussion about the title at discogs.com, see link E-Kartoffel (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support the current title should redirect to Pin-up (disambiguation). 65.94.45.160 (talk) 04:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Undecided, with a good reason - The title appears to be one word on the album cover, and Bowie experts might agree. Discogs appears to be a rare case of using the one-word title. But just about every other source that discusses this album, from magazine articles to books to retail websites, uses the two-word version. It looks like that's the way history developed and there's no going back. I would support the move, and demand that thousands of online and offline media sources fix the title, if David Bowie himself came out and said the title should be one word. Has he ever commented on the issue specifically? --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
FWIW... libraries consider the name on the label the "official" name of an album. And the label for this album says "Pin-Ups". So now everybody can be even more confused.—Chowbok ☠ 23:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Which is the original composition?
The description says the album has only one original composition, but every track listed for the album is attributed to someone else. Is there an original contribution, or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.87.60 (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- We don't know. That was the original plan (to include one original song), but that plan was dropped. Now it's all covers.87Fan (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)